Duration: 2 months
Process: Concept to ME design stage
Brand: Aver, in house project

Soft touch luxury
To elevate the entire holding experience, the top surface of the remote including the buttons are combined into one single pieace of soft-touch rubber pad, which has beautiful curvature surface on the sides.

Button’s Zone Defining
Design based on one-handed operation by the user, and classify the operating area into blocks 1 to 3 according to usage frequency.
1st: The area in the middle of the remote control is the best area for one-handed operation performance.
→ The most frequently used function groups can be placed here.
2nd: The area above or below the middle is second best.
→ Function groups for less frequently used or sequential operations can be placed here.
3rd: The top or bottom areas are the least desirable.
→ Some important but less frequently used functions, or functions that are considered prone to misoperation can be placed here.
Cross model compatibility
To Design a true “Universal Remote” across AVer's product line, we come up with a brand new keyboard structure design.
Even though the requirement for function keys may differ across product lines, button labels can be easily modified by changing the artwork on the rubber pad. The keypad can contain up to 46 keys.


UX Study
Before working on the ID, I studied a competitive and ergonomic analysis of PTZ camera remote controls. My focus was on comparing the functional layouts and button counts of various competitor brands used in classrooms, conference rooms, and stages. Additionally, I analyzed human factors principles to optimize these remotes for single-handed operation, clear functional zoning, and high-contrast visual clarity.










Other proposals
During the ID proposal stage, I presented three distinct design variations, each featuring its own unique characteristics.



